Some people are asking why I haven't posted here in a while. One answer is I've been too busy on other projects. Another is that they've published some good material recently, which makes my point.
I enjoy the Interpreter overall; it's only, or primarily, on the issue of Book of Mormon geography that the Interpreter is a dogmatic, arrogant and cynical journal that has come to resemble the later years of FARMS. I'm still hoping for a change at the Interpreter, sooner or later, in this respect.
That said, there is still plenty of material from the past that needs some actual peer reviewing...
I enjoy the Interpreter overall; it's only, or primarily, on the issue of Book of Mormon geography that the Interpreter is a dogmatic, arrogant and cynical journal that has come to resemble the later years of FARMS. I'm still hoping for a change at the Interpreter, sooner or later, in this respect.
That said, there is still plenty of material from the past that needs some actual peer reviewing...
Have you noticed that the Interpreter has allowed a comment advertising a book describing a North America setting for the Book of Mormon? here:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.mormoninterpreter.com/models-and-methods-in-book-of-mormon-geography-the-peruvian-model-as-a-test-case/#comment-18538
Does this signal a censorship change at the Interpreter that we all are hoping for?