WSJ article:
Flood of Fake Science Forces Multiple Journal Closures
Wiley to shutter 19 more journals, some tainted by fraud
Excerpts:
Fake studies have flooded the publishers of top scientific journals, leading to thousands of retractions and millions of dollars in lost revenue. The biggest hit has come to Wiley, a 217-year-old publisher based in Hoboken, N.J., which Tuesday will announce that it is closing 19 journals, some of which were infected by large-scale research fraud.
In the past two years, Wiley has retracted more than 11,300 papers that appeared compromised, according to a spokesperson, and closed four journals. It isn’t alone: At least two other publishers have retracted hundreds of suspect papers each. Several others have pulled smaller clusters of bad papers....
The sources of the fake science are “paper mills”—businesses or individuals that, for a price, will list a scientist as an author of a wholly or partially fabricated paper. The mill then submits the work, generally avoiding the most prestigious journals in favor of publications such as one-off special editions that might not undergo as thorough a review and where they have a better chance of getting bogus work published.
World-over, scientists are under pressure to publish in peer-reviewed journals—sometimes to win grants, other times as conditions for promotions. ...
Scientific papers typically include citations that acknowledge work that informed the research, but the suspect papers included lists of irrelevant references. Multiple papers included technical-sounding passages inserted midway through, what Bishop called an “AI gobbledygook sandwich.” Nearly identical contact emails in one cluster of studies were all registered to a university in China where few if any of the authors were based. It appeared that all came from the same source....
Another data scientist, Adam Day, built “The Papermill Alarm,” a tool that uses large language models to spot signs of trouble in an article’s metadata, such as multiple suspect papers citing each other or using similar templates and simply altering minor experimental details.
I'm not the only one that can see clearly that the past 4 years of this stupid covid stuff that was fake "science" and based on fear and foolishness of messing with exaggerated "facts" that were NOT facts. It might be that I never watch the Main stream media news. I've not had a T.V. in over 65 years. There has been so much propaganda that's been repeated and repeated that when folks hear it enough, they think it's true. YEARS of propaganda that led up to this stupid covid stuff. And the "mask thing". good grief. science? NOT. 6 foot distance? science? NOT. I've lost a lot of admiration of "doctors, hospitals, government officials etc" through this last 4 years. I'm not the only one. And this article and mention of the cool word "gobbledygook" fits the bill. Thank you for your post here. aloha, Irene Tukuafu
ReplyDelete